I was very proud of myself for having constructed the argument in my previous post. I carefully laid out my argument for the guys in class, fully expecting to get the appreciation I deserve as a teacher! (That should have been a warning to me!)
Wrong! After I finished my exposition, Ron sat back and said, “Wait a minute. I think there’s an inconsistency there.” Ron went on to explain what he meant, and I was busted! Oops.
As you may recall, I was aiming for putting shoe leather on the following statement:
A job is holy when God assigns it, and he is present and actively involved in the work.
My “brilliant” argument was that this becomes real when we experience a confluence of God-given skill and God-given desire. Unfortunately, just down the page from the statement above was this statement:
Unless a job is immoral, unethical, or contrary to the will of God, it is holy if the worker shares a right relationship with God.
Although I believe my argument is partially right, or at least valid in some situations, I want to teach the complete truth. It is true that God often is in the assigning of a job when the God-given skill to accomplish it comes together with the God-given desire to accomplish it, but it is not required. If God is working in a thing, it is holy whether I participate or not. Whether I want to do it or not, whether I have the skill to do it or not, God in the work is what makes it holy, and the only way I can participate in it is if I am in a relationship with Jesus Christ. Apart from him I can do nothing. (John 15:5)
It’s really all about relationship. Even Ron admitted that his struggle over work issues from a week or so back came down to wanting things his way. He felt like things should go a certain way for him to be ministering to people. When he recognized that he was driving, he refocused on his relationship with Jesus Christ and came to some answers.
Thank you, Ron!